Subscription figures are provider list prices recorded in treg.to’s own catalog grid; per-call prices are what treg.to charges today, with $0.000 added.
set up treg — https://treg.to/llms.txt
Using treg, get the backlink summary for our domain and our three main competitors from the cheapest verified provider, show me the price first, then put referring domains, follow share and the authority score in one table and tell me where the gap is widest.
Most rows want the domain without scheme or www, and a page URL where you mean a page. Say which, or the agent guesses.
Each provider prices the summary per target, and the dearest per-call row is ten times the cheapest. Four domains is four calls.
Moz DA, Majestic Trust Flow, Semrush Authority Score: each belongs to its vendor and compares only to itself. Ask for one and stick to it.
treg.to returns the rate before the call, so the agent can say what a thousand expired domains will spend before it starts.
treg.to holds the provider keys. Neither you nor the agent sees them.
The provider's own rate, $0.000 markup, from a prepaid balance.
Charged per call. $1.00 free per new team, no card to start.
Already pay Hunter? Register it and those calls are never metered.
Another provider is a different word in the prompt, not a new integration.
No SDK, no OAuth dance per vendor, no seats.
treg.to does not choose for you. It hands ChatGPT this comparison, with the price shown before any call, and ChatGPT picks. Or you tell it how: "cheapest", "most reliable", "the one that takes what I have", or a provider by name.
Serpstat at $0.0025
Majestic at $0.0008
Those units are not interchangeable: one call can return many results, so compare on the unit you will actually be billed in.
| Provider | Success | Median | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100% | 502ms | 13 calls | |
| 100% | 643ms | 184 calls | |
| 100% | 981ms | 121 calls | |
| 100% | 1.2s | 24 calls |
Measured on treg.to traffic: real calls, real inputs, and sample sizes differ by provider. Live reliability, not a controlled benchmark.
| Provider | Price | Accepts | Success rate | Verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $0.0008 per result | cmd, items, item0, datasource | (2 calls) | unverified | |
| $0.0025 per call | method, params, id, params.query, params.searchType | 100% (121 calls) | unverified | |
| $0.0133 per call | targets, distributions | 100% (13 calls) | 2026-07-31 | |
| $0.0179 per result | target, mode | 100% (24 calls) | 2026-07-31 | |
| $0.024 per call | target, include_subdomains, include_indirect_links, exclude_internal_backlinks, backlinks_status_type, internal_list_limit | 100% (184 calls) | 2026-07-28 | |
| no dollar rate published | type, target, target_type, export_columns, export_escape | not yet measured | unverified |
treg call serpstat.web.backlinks.summary
Swap the id for any provider above. All 6 endpoints behind this job, with their parameters and captured responses, are on the Backlinks, authority & domain metrics shelf.
Backlink threads are among the most seeded in SEO: of the ~163 Reddit and X posts read in August 2026, one vendor's ring ran to eleven posts across five subreddits with the same template, and link sellers filled most of the rest. These five are people paying for the data themselves.
“Don't really want to drop $14K to have access to the ahrefs API” r/bigseo
What this page can do about it: That is a plan, and here there is none. A summary is a call, priced per call at the provider's rate, from a prepaid balance with no minimum and no tier to unlock.
“two more weeks until my @ahrefs API credits reset. BRUTAL. this may push me to the $449/mo plan.” X
What this page can do about it: Nothing here resets. The balance is money, it is spent per call, and the rate is printed before the agent spends it. When it runs out you top it up; you do not wait.
“Just started testing APIs for backlinks of the two.. Which ones data do you prefer when it comes to linkbuilding?” r/SEO
What this page can do about it: No comparison table can answer that for your niche. The cheap experiment is on this page: pull the same domain from Serpstat, Moz and DataForSEO for a few cents and see which index has the links you know exist.
“DA checks are way too expensive at volume” r/Domains, 7 points
What this page can do about it: At volume the per-call rate is the whole story: Moz's DA row is two quota rows a call, and the cheaper summaries here carry their own vendor's score. An agent looping a list of expired domains is the fit; the price of the loop is the rate times the list.
“If Ahrefs DR should be ignored, then which “domain rating” you should care about?” X
What this page can do about it: None of them is more than its vendor's model, and this page will not crown one. What it can do is put four vendors' scores for the same domain in one table, with the referring-domain counts beside them, so the agent shows its working.
The forum's problem is not the data, it is the plan: an API tier priced for enterprises, a credit allowance that resets in two weeks, a seat that costs hundreds a month for one column. Here Serpstat's summary is $0.0025 a call, Moz's two quota rows come to $0.0133, SE Ranking's 100 credits to $0.0179 per target and DataForSEO's request to $0.024 plus a fraction of a cent per returned row, metered from a prepaid balance at the provider's rate with $0.000 added. A new team's free dollar is a few hundred Serpstat summaries.
Majestic charges one index item unit per target, and it is the same command as its URL metrics call, so ask for one and read both sets of columns rather than paying twice. Semrush charges 40 API units flat for the overview and publishes no dollar rate for a unit, so the page prints no price and it runs on your own Semrush plan. Neither has been called live through treg.to yet; the other four have, and the measured success rates on this page come from that traffic.
Moz's call is its URL metrics with distributions on, which adds histograms by domain authority, spam score and root domains; SE Ranking's summary is ten times the price of its metrics call and adds the full breakdown, so use metrics when you only need totals; DataForSEO returns the counts, rank and spam score with breakdown arrays you can cap. Read the docs linked on each row before the agent loops.
A backlink API returns what a link index knows about a domain or a page as data: how many pages link to it, from how many distinct domains, how many of those links pass authority, and a score the vendor computes from all of it. The summary endpoint on this page is the one-row version, the profile rather than the list of links; the list is a different job. Each provider runs its own crawler and its own index, so DataForSEO, Moz, Serpstat, SE Ranking, Majestic and Semrush will each give a different referring-domain count for the same domain, and none of them is the count. Ahrefs, the index most of the forum pays for, is not in the catalog.
No. Ahrefs is not in the catalog, and this page does not resell or proxy it. The six indexes here are the alternatives, each priced per call at its own rate, and the honest note is that their counts and scores are theirs, not Ahrefs'.
Because each provider crawls the web itself and keeps its own index. A link one crawler found last week is one another has not reached. There is no correct count; pick one index and compare domains within it, or pull two and treat the overlap as the confident set.
Moz's DA is in Moz's row, and only there; Majestic returns Trust Flow and Citation Flow, Semrush its Authority Score, DataForSEO and SE Ranking their own rank. Each score is comparable only to itself, and no provider's number should be read as another's.
The one whose columns match the question and whose rate fits the volume. treg.to shows all six side by side with the rate and the measured success; it compares, it does not route or fail over for you.