Subscription figures are provider list prices recorded in treg.to’s own catalog grid; per-call prices are what treg.to charges today, with $0.000 added.
set up treg — https://treg.to/llms.txt
Using treg, find 25 heads of growth at US SaaS companies with 50 to 200 employees. Show me the price first, keep the result set small, and give me name, title, company and LinkedIn URL.
Several providers bill per row. “Find everyone” is a bill, not a query.
Some searches are free and only the contact details cost.
Seniority, department, headcount and location are provider filters, not your post-processing.
Company domain resolves cleanly. A company name does not, and returns the wrong people.
treg.to holds the provider keys. Neither you nor the agent sees them.
The provider's own rate, $0.000 markup, from a prepaid balance.
Charged per call. $1.00 free per new team, no card to start.
Already pay Hunter? Register it and those calls are never metered.
Another provider is a different word in the prompt, not a new integration.
No SDK, no OAuth dance per vendor, no seats.
treg.to does not choose for you. It hands ChatGPT this comparison, with the price shown before any call, and ChatGPT picks. Or you tell it how: "cheapest", "most reliable", "the one that takes what I have", or a provider by name.
Icypeas at $0.00038 · People & contact data
Just One API at $0.0295 · LinkedIn
Those units are not interchangeable: one call can return many results, so compare on the unit you will actually be billed in.
| Provider | Success | Median | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|
| People Data Labs | 100% | 113ms | 15 calls |
| 100% | 227ms | 436 calls | |
| 100% | 390ms | 3390 calls | |
| 100% | 510ms | 42 calls | |
| 100% | 734ms | 151 calls | |
| 100% | 1.1s | 10 calls |
Measured on treg.to traffic: real calls, real inputs, and sample sizes differ by provider. Live reliability, not a controlled benchmark.
| Provider | Price | Accepts | Success rate | Verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $0.0295 per found | name, firstName, lastName, title, company, school | 100% (42 calls) | unverified |
| Provider | Price | Accepts | Success rate | Verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00038 per result | query, pagination | 100% (10 calls) | 2026-08-20 | |
| $0.00125 per result | job_title, company_domain, company_name, limit, company_filters, titles | 100% (151 calls) | 2026-07-28 | |
| $0.00245 per result | companies, type, limit, per_domain, domain, company | 100% (3390 calls) | 2026-07-31 | |
| $0.00499 per result | pages, filters | (4 calls) | 2026-07-28 | |
| $0.0196 per result | expand, page, pageSize, domains, positionQuery, seniority | not yet measured | 2026-08-20 | |
| $0.0198 per result | website, job_titles, count | not yet measured | unverified | |
| $0.02 per result | searchParams, currentCompanies, pageSize, cursor | not yet measured | unverified | |
| Diffbot | $0.0299 per result | query, type, size, from, format, jsonmode | 100% (8 calls) | 2026-07-28 |
| People Data Labs | $0.38 per result | sql, query, size, scroll_token, dataset, titlecase | 100% (15 calls) | 2026-07-31 |
| free, your own account | person_titles[], person_seniorities[], person_locations[], organization_locations[], q_organization_domains_list[], organization_num_employees_ranges[] | 100% (436 calls) | unverified | |
| Coresignal | free, your own account | query | 98% (67 calls) | unverified |
| free, your own account | field_ids, query, order, limit, after_id | not yet measured | unverified | |
| free, your own account | cursor, companyDomains, companyNames, companyIndustries, companyTypes, companyFundingRounds | 100% (12 calls) | 2026-08-20 | |
| free, your own account | size, peopleFilters, companiesFilters, peoplePerCompany, jobTitleThreshold, searchAfter | not yet measured | 2026-08-20 |
treg call icypeas.people.search --data '{"query":{"currentCompanyWebsite":{"include":["stripe.com"]},"currentJobTitle":{"include":["Engineer"]}},"pagination":{"size":1}}'Swap the id for any provider above. All 20 endpoints behind this job, with their parameters and captured responses, are on the LinkedIn, People & contact data shelf.
The complaints here are less about accuracy than about access: the search that does not exist, the bill that scales with rows, and the seat licence. From ~180 Reddit and X posts in August 2026, vendor rings excluded.
“I need an open search option where I can find people across companies by job title (e.g., 'CTO' or 'Product Manager') and other filters.” Reddit
What this page can do about it: That is this job. The comparison below marks which providers support unbounded search by title and location, and which can only list people at a company you already named.
“zoominfo has the best mobile numbers by far, but at like 15k/seat minimum they're pricing out anyone who isn't enterprise” r/CRM
What this page can do about it: There are no seats here and no minimum. Calls are metered per row or per call from a shared team balance that starts with $1.00 free, so a hundred-row test costs cents.
“scraping twitter directly got my accounts banned pretty fast. linkedin is even worse, flags you almost immediately.” r/openclaw, 72 points
What this page can do about it: The providers here run their own infrastructure, so your accounts are not in the loop. That is an operational answer, not a legal one: check each provider's terms for your use, because treg.to relays their answer and makes nothing lawful that was not.
“I've heard of ZoomInfo, Apollo, LeadSquared, IndiaMART but no idea about quality for Indian market specifically.” r/b2bmarketing
What this page can do about it: No comparison table can answer this, and anyone claiming otherwise is guessing. Per-row pricing makes the real test cheap: run the same 100-row query of your actual market through three providers and keep the one that holds up.
Apollo's people search is free precisely because it returns no emails or phone numbers, Hunter's multi-domain search is free until you unlock an address, and Lusha's search returns masked previews. Budget for the reveal, not the search.
People Data Labs charges one credit for every record in the response, so a size=1000 call is a thousand credits; Icypeas charges 0.02 credits a row. Both are legitimate, but only one survives an agent that forgets to set a limit. Cap the result set in the prompt.
LeadMagic and CompanyEnrich want a company domain; a bare company name is ambiguous and quietly returns people from the wrong company. Give the domain wherever you have it.
It queries a provider's index of working professionals by attributes rather than by name: job title, seniority, department, company, headcount, industry, location. It answers “who are the people like this”, where an enrichment API answers “who is this person”. Most of these return the person without contact details, which you then resolve separately.
Usually not, and that is why the search is cheap or free. You get the person and then resolve the address with a separate call, which is a separate price.
Set a limit. Providers that bill per row charge for every record they return, so a thousand-row response is a thousand charges. Ask the agent for a small result set first.
Both exist here, and they are different products. The comparison marks which providers support open search by title and location and which need a company first.
Search on a free or per-row-cheap provider, filter down to the people you actually want, then spend on contact details only for those. The two-step flow is why search and reveal are priced separately.