5 providers · from $0.001 per result · $0.000 markup

LinkedIn jobs API and job scraper: job postings across companies as rows your agent can read

Search job postings by title, keyword, company or location and get them back as rows, for hiring signals, market research or a job board of your own. 5 providers answer through one treg.to key on two shelves: LinkedIn job search from a tenth of a cent per posting, and company level openings from the firmographic databases, each at its own rate with $0.000 added. Two things this page will not pretend: there is no Indeed row in the catalog, so the 720 people a month searching for an Indeed API will not find one here, and no row here removes duplicates, ghost jobs or stale dates. The postings arrive as the platform shows them.
$1.00 of free credit on every new team · no provider signup · no card
5 of 6 endpoints on this page are live-verified against the provider.
compared on this page
ApifyLeadMagicPredictLeadsTikHub
The economics

What 100 of these actually costs

the wide end
$4.00
PredictLeads, the dearest here, for the same 100
you pay
$0.10
100 × $0.001 at Apify, metered per call

Subscription figures are provider list prices recorded in treg.to’s own catalog grid; per-call prices are what treg.to charges today, with $0.000 added.

Try it

What’s the best way to ask ChatGPT?

1Set your agent up, once
in your agent's chat
set up treg — https://treg.to/llms.txt
2Ask for the job
the prompt
Using treg, find every posting for a data engineer in Berlin published in the last week, show me the price per 100 postings from each provider first, cap the run at 500 rows, then give me a table of company, title, date posted and link, deduped on the posting URL, and say how many rows came back.
works in
ChatGPTClaudeClaude CodeCodexCursorGemini CLI

Why this prompt works

Give the title and the place

The LinkedIn rows take a keyword and a location; the company rows take a company or a filter. Say which you have.

Cap the run

The Apify row bills per posting it returns and a broad search returns thousands. A maxItems cap is the difference between a cent and a dollar.

Ask for the date and the link

The date posted is the field nobody trusts and the link is the one that lets you check. Both belong on the table.

Dedupe on the posting URL

The same job is reposted, cross-posted and recycled. No row here dedupes for you; the agent has to.

Why treg.to

Why go through treg.to

One key, not 9 accounts

treg.to holds the provider keys. Neither you nor the agent sees them.

Price before the call

The provider's own rate, $0.000 markup, from a prepaid balance.

No subscription, no seats

Charged per call. $1.00 free per new team, no card to start.

Your own keys are free

Already pay Hunter? Register it and those calls are never metered.

Switch by changing a word

Another provider is a different word in the prompt, not a new integration.

Nothing to integrate

No SDK, no OAuth dance per vendor, no seats.

Behind the scenes

What ChatGPT sees before it calls

treg.to does not choose for you. It hands ChatGPT this comparison, with the price shown before any call, and ChatGPT picks. Or you tell it how: "cheapest", "most reliable", "the one that takes what I have", or a provider by name.

What do job postings cost, per shelf?

Cheapest per result

ApifyApify at $0.001 · LinkedIn

Cheapest per call

PredictLeadsPredictLeads at $0.04 · Company data

Cheapest per found

TikHubTikHub at $0.001 · LinkedIn

Those units are not interchangeable: one call can return many results, so compare on the unit you will actually be billed in.

Which jobs API is the most reliable?

ProviderSuccessMedianSample
Crustdata100%798ms24 calls
ApifyApify100%24.1s110 calls
LeadMagicLeadMagic87%2.0s768 calls
Measured on treg.to traffic: real calls, real inputs, and sample sizes differ by provider. Live reliability, not a controlled benchmark.

How do the two shelves compare?

Company data

ProviderPriceAcceptsSuccess rateVerified
Crustdata$0.009 per resultfilters, fields, sorts, limit, cursor, aggregations100% (24 calls)2026-08-25
LeadMagicLeadMagic$0.025 per resulttitles.include, companies.include, location.countries, seniority, hasRemote, postedWithin87% (768 calls)2026-07-28
PredictLeadsPredictLeads$0.04 per callactive_only, not_closed, location, first_seen_at_from, first_seen_at_until, last_seen_at_fromnot yet measured2026-08-20

LinkedIn

ProviderPriceAcceptsSuccess rateVerified
ApifyApify$0.001 per resultmaxItems, maxTotalChargeUsd, timeout, jobTitles, company, locations100% (110 calls)2026-08-20
TikHubTikHub$0.001 per foundlocation, keyword, country, job_type, experience_level, time_range (38 calls)unverified

Run one

the cheapest verified call
treg call apify.linkedin.search.jobs --query maxItems=1 --query maxTotalChargeUsd=0.05 --query timeout=180 --data '{"jobTitles":["attorney"],"locations":["Miami, Florida"],"maxItems":1}'

Swap the id for any provider above. All 6 endpoints behind this job, with their parameters and captured responses, are on the Company data, LinkedIn shelf.

How these numbers are made

PricesEach provider’s own published rate, converted to US dollars for one chargeable event of the unit they bill in. treg.to adds $0.000. Where a provider bills in credits, the conversion uses the rate on their public pricing page, last checked 2026-08-25.
Success ratetreg.to’s own served calls over the last 30 days: 2xx counts as a success, 5xx and timeouts as a failure. A 4xx is excluded, because it usually means the caller sent bad parameters and one bad query should not make a healthy endpoint look broken.
What this is notA controlled benchmark. These are real calls with real inputs, so sample sizes and the difficulty of what was asked differ by provider. Treat the rates as live reliability, not a like-for-like test.
VerifiedThe date treg.to last called the endpoint end to end and confirmed the shape of its response and the price it charged.
From the field

What people actually struggle with

Of the ~210 Reddit and X posts read in August 2026 roughly half were on the job, the densest corpus behind any of these pages, and five vendor clusters were excluded, including one launch story reposted to three subreddits with the AI tool's name swapped each time. These five are people fighting the boards.

The boards fight back

“Since when did Indeed start injecting invisible fake job cards as a scraper honeypot?” X, 189 likes

What this page can do about it: Which is why there is no Indeed row here and this page says so in its first paragraph. The LinkedIn rows exist because a provider absorbs that fight on its side; on Indeed nobody in the catalog does.

The filters are the problem, not the data

“I hate LinkedIn and Indeed. Filters don't work well, search experience is terrible, and the sites are contaminated with so many offshore agencies.” r/findapath, 745 points

What this page can do about it: Rows fix the filter half: once the postings are data, your agent filters them by whatever rule you like. The contamination half arrives with the data, and the agent is the filter for that too.

The date is the field nobody trusts

“Not being able to trust the date posted of any job. Being shown too many irrelevant jobs.” r/leetcode, 401 points

What this page can do about it: No row here fixes the date; it returns what the platform shows. What a daily pull gives you is your own first seen date, which is the only one you can trust, and that costs a tenth of a cent a posting.

Half the postings are gone in a month

“Half are gone by day 28, and almost all of that drop happens in a single week.” r/jobsearchhacks, 376 points

What this page can do about it: That poster tracked over a million postings a day to learn it, and the method is the point: a repeated pull is what turns postings into a signal. The rows here make the pull cheap; the tracking is the agent's job.

The old way was cheaper and about as good

“Everyone in this community is bragging about AI-powered automations or seemingly simple workflows that call overpriced APIs to parse a page.” r/n8n, 307 points

What this page can do about it: Fair, and a tenth of a cent per posting is the answer to overpriced rather than to free. The self written scraper wins until LinkedIn changes something; the row wins the day after.

The detail

What actually differs

Two shelves, two prices.

On LinkedIn, Apify's job search actor bills a tenth of a cent per posting returned with no platform charge on top, and TikHub's LinkedIn row bills a tenth of a cent per successful call, which on a big search is the cheaper of the two. On the companies shelf Crustdata bills under a cent per result, LeadMagic two and a half cents, and PredictLeads four cents a call for a company's openings and a credit per record for a filtered search. All of it is the provider's own rate with $0.000 added. The row labelled treg is the routed endpoint: the explicit opt in where you ask treg.to to choose among the company rows, your own keys first, and it names the provider that served and bills that provider's rate.

The cap is the budget.

The Apify row is charged per dataset item it produces, so a search that matches four thousand postings costs four dollars unless maxItems says otherwise; set it on every call and read the run's usage afterwards. Per call rows have the opposite shape: one page costs the same whatever it holds, so page size is free and pagination is the cost.

What no row here does, said plainly: nothing dedupes across boards, nothing checks whether a posting is still live or was ever real, nothing crawls a company's own careers page, and there is no Indeed, Glassdoor or Naukri row.

The date posted is the platform's date, which the research says is the field people trust least. TikHub's LinkedIn job search has not been called live through treg.to yet and is marked unverified in the table; run one search before an agent runs a hundred.

Background

What is a jobs API?

It is a call that searches job postings and returns them as structured rows: title, company, location, date, description, link. The boards themselves mostly do not offer one to the public any more, which is why the searches for an Indeed API keep landing on scrapers. The rows here come in two shapes. The LinkedIn shelf searches LinkedIn's postings by keyword and location and returns the postings, priced per posting or per call. The companies shelf comes from the firmographic databases, which index job openings per company as a hiring signal, so the natural question there is which companies are hiring for what, rather than which jobs match a title.

Questions

Before you start

Is there an Indeed API here?

No. Indeed closed its publisher API and the catalog carries no Indeed row, scraped or official. The LinkedIn rows are the closest thing on this page, and the company rows answer a different question: who is hiring, not which jobs match a title.

Will I get duplicates and ghost jobs?

Yes, as many as the platform shows. No row here dedupes across reposts or checks that a posting is real, and this page will not claim otherwise. Dedupe on the posting URL in the agent, and treat the date posted as the platform's claim.

How much does a big pull cost?

On the per posting row, the number of postings times a tenth of a cent, which is why the prompt caps the run. On the per call rows, the number of pages. Ask the agent to print the price for your cap on every row before it runs.

Can I get a company's openings as a hiring signal?

That is what the companies shelf is for. PredictLeads, Crustdata and LeadMagic index openings per company, so an agent can ask which of your two hundred target accounts opened an engineering role this month, without searching a board at all.