Subscription figures are provider list prices recorded in treg.to’s own catalog grid; per-call prices are what treg.to charges today, with $0.000 added.
set up treg — https://treg.to/llms.txt
Using treg, search YouTube for videos about home espresso uploaded in the last month, sorted by view count. Show me the price first, then give me the top 20 with links.
A keyword, the way you would type it into the site's own box.
Upload date, duration, type and sort order are parameters on every provider.
The same query returns either. Say which, or you get a mix.
Search results carry no view counts. The agent fetches those next.
treg.to holds the provider keys. Neither you nor the agent sees them.
The provider's own rate, $0.000 markup, from a prepaid balance.
Charged per call. $1.00 free per new team, no card to start.
Already pay Hunter? Register it and those calls are never metered.
Another provider is a different word in the prompt, not a new integration.
No SDK, no OAuth dance per vendor, no seats.
treg.to does not choose for you. It hands ChatGPT this comparison, with the price shown before any call, and ChatGPT picks. Or you tell it how: "cheapest", "most reliable", "the one that takes what I have", or a provider by name.
TikHub at $0.001
ScrapeCreators at $0.00188
Those units are not interchangeable: one call can return many results, so compare on the unit you will actually be billed in.
| Provider | Success | Median | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100% | 261ms | 8 calls | |
| 100% | 1.3s | 270 calls | |
| 100% | 3.7s | 340 calls |
Measured on treg.to traffic: real calls, real inputs, and sample sizes differ by provider. Live reliability, not a controlled benchmark.
| Provider | Price | Accepts | Success rate | Verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $0.001 per found | search_query, language_code, order_by, country_code, continuation_token, time_zone | 100% (270 calls) | 2026-07-28 | |
| $0.00188 per call | query, uploadDate, sortBy, type, duration, region | 100% (340 calls) | unverified | |
| $0.0148 per found | keyword, continuationToken, uploadDate, type, duration, features | (3 calls) | 2026-07-28 | |
| $0.015 per found | engine, search_query, gl, hl, sp | (1 calls) | 2026-07-28 | |
| free, your own account | part, q, type, order, publishedAfter, regionCode | 100% (8 calls) | 2026-07-28 |
treg call tikhub.x.youtube-web-search-video --query search_query=Minecraft
Swap the id for any provider above. All 9 endpoints behind this job, with their parameters and captured responses, are on the YouTube shelf.
This is the job where the free route runs out first, and the people who have hit it are unusually precise about why. From ~180 Reddit and X posts in August 2026, with the vendor clusters excluded.
“The official Data API v3 search.list costs 100 units/call against a 10k/day quota, which dies almost immediately once you're polling multiple keyword combos” r/webscraping, 7 points
What this page can do about it: Exactly right, and worth stating as arithmetic: 100 units a search against a 10,000 unit day is about 100 searches for the entire project, before you spend anything hydrating the results with view counts. Every other call on this page costs 1 unit. That gap is the reason the paid rows on this page exist.
“Roughly what request rate gets you rate-limited / soft-banned on the InnerTube route?” r/webscraping, 7 points
What this page can do about it: Nobody in the research knew, including the person who asked, and we do not either. What we can say is that the request leaves the provider's infrastructure rather than yours, and that the measured success rates shown here are live traffic rather than a claim. That is the honest version of an answer to this question.
“I want an API or scraper which helps me replicate the same results when I do a search on mobile. Is there a way?” r/n8n, 1 point
What this page can do about it: No, not exactly, from anyone. On the site the ranking is personalised, regional and signed in; these calls are none of those. Pass a region and language to get nearer a market. No comparison table can tell you whose ordering matches your users, so run your own query through two providers for a cent and diff the two lists.
“The problem is my playlist contains 1.2k songs but I can only transfer around 60 songs and after that its an error” r/learnpython
What this page can do about it: ChatGPT wrote them a loop that runs one search per track, which at 100 units each is a dead project at song 100. This is the failure this page is really about: the code is fine and the quota model is what nobody read. Tell your agent the price first and it can tell you the run is unaffordable before it starts.
“So I built a Python script to scrape YouTube Shorts from a specific niche (AI kids bedtime stories), pull stats, transcripts” r/shortsAlgorithm, 78 points
What this page can do about it: Search, then details, then transcripts, over a niche, on a schedule. That is three jobs on this menu chained, and it is what almost everyone doing this actually wants. Per call pricing makes the sweep something you can size in advance instead of a quota you discover the edge of.
To rank what you found by views you take the video ids and call the video details job, which on Google's own API costs 1 quota unit for 50 ids. Budget for two steps, not one.
Every other call on this page costs 1. That single number is why paid search providers exist at all.
Sending q to its YouTube engine returns nothing rather than an error, which is the kind of failure that looks like an empty result set.
A page of search results as structured records: video id, title, description snippet, channel name and id, publish date and thumbnails, plus a token to fetch the next page. It is the site's own ranking, not a fresh index, so results move as YouTube's does and two calls minutes apart can legitimately differ.
Google prices the search method at 100 units against a 10,000 unit daily default, roughly 100 searches a day for an entire project. Reading a video, a channel or a comment thread costs 1. A quota increase means an application and a review.
Yes. Google's search takes a channelId, and one TikHub endpoint searches within a channel by id. The comparison above names which endpoint does which.
No, on any provider. That is a second call to the video details job, which is cheap and batches, so ask your agent for both and it will chain them.
Close, but not guaranteed. Results are personalised and regional on the site, and these calls are not signed in as you. Pass a region and language to get nearer a given market.