set up treg — https://treg.to/llms.txt
Using treg, expand 'protein powder' into 50 related keywords, then get Google search volume, CPC and competition for all of them in one batch, and the 12-month trend for the top 5. Show me the price before each call. Give me a CSV with keyword, monthly_volume, cpc_usd, competition, q4_vs_rest_pct and suggested_spend_pct by volume share.
One ideas call turns a seed into a list; one volume call prices the whole list. Two calls, not fifty.
The volume route bills per request, not per keyword, so 50 keywords cost the same as one.
The trend route takes five keywords per call. Spend it on the terms that carry the volume.
If you connect a Google Ads account, the same volume and ideas calls run on your own quota at no metered cost.
Prices are the provider’s own rate, read from the catalog when this page loads, with $0.000 added by treg.to. Success rates are treg.to’s own served calls over the last 30 days.
| # | Step | What the agent asks | Provider used | Price | Success rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Expand the seedBilled per request plus a small amount per keyword returned. Set the limit; the default is 100. | related keywords with volume, CPC and difficulty | $0.012 per call | 100% (2746 calls, 463ms median) | |
| 2 | Price the list in one batchOne flat request covers up to 1,000 keywords. Never loop this route. | monthly volume, CPC, competition and 12 monthly figures per keyword | $0.09 per call | 100% (4135 calls, 2.7s median) | |
| 3 | Read the trendThe run asked treg's routed trends endpoint, which picks the cheapest provider with your own keys first; this is the child that served. | interest over time for up to five keywords | $0.0012 per call | not yet measured |
Run on 2026-09-14, 50 keywords in.
Three calls, three receipts. The ideas call billed its request fee plus a fraction of a cent per keyword returned; the volume call billed one flat fee for the whole batch, which is why the table's per-row price is misleading for it; the trend call was routed and settled at the child's rate. The head term's Q4 volume runs 29% below the rest of the year, so the seasonality column matters for this niche.
treg.to holds the provider keys. Neither you nor the agent sees them.
The provider's own rate, $0.000 markup, from a prepaid balance.
Charged per call. $1.00 free per new team, no card to start.
Already pay Hunter? Register it and those calls are never metered.
Another provider is a different word in the prompt, not a new integration.
No SDK, no OAuth dance per vendor, no seats.
Google reports nothing for very low-volume terms. The batch is still billed as one request.
A connected Google Ads account with little spend sees bucketed ranges instead of exact numbers. That is Google's limit, not the API's.
The trend route takes at most five keywords per call. Send the head terms, not the list.
Local or tightly targeted campaigns see different auction prices.
The receipt above is the answer for this run. The volume call is a flat fee per request, so the list length barely moves the bill.
Yes. Connect it and the ideas and volume calls route through the Keyword Planner API on your own quota.
DataForSEO has Bing volume routes with the same shape. Ask for both and merge on keyword.
The trend series is weekly for the past twelve months and reflects past demand, not a forecast.