Subscription figures are provider list prices recorded in treg.to’s own catalog grid; per-call prices are what treg.to charges today, with $0.000 added.
set up treg — https://treg.to/llms.txt
Using treg, enrich these 30 domains into a table: company name, industry, headcount, country, founded year and tech stack. Show me the price first, and mark any field that came back empty.
A domain maps to one company. A name is ambiguous and matches the wrong one.
Some providers price per section requested. Asking for everything costs more.
An empty field is information. A quietly guessed one is not.
Several providers have a bulk route at half the single-call price.
treg.to holds the provider keys. Neither you nor the agent sees them.
The provider's own rate, $0.000 markup, from a prepaid balance.
Charged per call. $1.00 free per new team, no card to start.
Already pay Hunter? Register it and those calls are never metered.
Another provider is a different word in the prompt, not a new integration.
No SDK, no OAuth dance per vendor, no seats.
treg.to does not choose for you. It hands ChatGPT this comparison, with the price shown before any call, and ChatGPT picks. Or you tell it how: "cheapest", "most reliable", "the one that takes what I have", or a provider by name.
The Companies API at $0.0019
Bright Data at $0.0015
CompanyEnrich at $0.0098
Those units are not interchangeable: one call can return many results, so compare on the unit you will actually be billed in.
| Provider | Success | Median | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|
| People Data Labs | 100% | 113ms | 51 calls |
| 100% | 202ms | 71 calls | |
| The Companies API | 100% | 262ms | 293 calls |
| 100% | 371ms | 126 calls | |
| 100% | 5.4s | 8 calls |
Measured on treg.to traffic: real calls, real inputs, and sample sizes differ by provider. Live reliability, not a controlled benchmark.
| Provider | Price | Accepts | Success rate | Verified |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $0.0015 per result | dataset_id, format, input | not yet measured | unverified | |
| The Companies API | $0.0019 per found | simplified, refresh, domain, email | 100% (293 calls) | unverified |
| $0.0049 per found | domain, clearbit_format | 100% (126 calls) | 2026-07-31 | |
| $0.0089 per found | domain | not yet measured | 2026-08-20 | |
| $0.0095 per found | url | (1 calls) | 2026-08-20 | |
| $0.0098 per call | domain, expand, name, linkedinUrl, linkedinId, twitterUrl | (1 calls) | 2026-08-20 | |
| $0.0198 per found | domain, name, linkedin_url | not yet measured | unverified | |
| Brand.dev | $0.025 per found | domain, maxSpeed, maxAgeMs, timeoutMS, force_language, name | (3 calls) | 2026-08-20 |
| $0.025 per found | company_domain, profile_url, company_name | 100% (8 calls) | 2026-07-31 | |
| $0.026 per found | domain, website, name, linkedin_url | 100% (71 calls) | unverified | |
| Diffbot | $0.0299 per call | type, url, name, location, ip, phone | (4 calls) | 2026-07-28 |
| $0.04 per found | companyIdentifier, companyDomain, companyName | not yet measured | unverified | |
| $0.04 per call | id_or_domain | (2 calls) | 2026-08-20 | |
| $0.25 per found | companies | (2 calls) | 2026-07-31 | |
| People Data Labs | $0.38 per found | website, name, profile, ticker, location, locality | 100% (51 calls) | 2026-07-31 |
| Coresignal | $0.392 per found | website, fields, id | (1 calls) | unverified |
| Akta by Wokelo | $0.875 per found | company, sections | (10 calls) | 2026-07-31 |
| free, your own account | field_ids, card_ids, entity_id | (2 calls) | unverified | |
| free, your own account | company, people, fields, domains, companyDataMapping, webhookUrl | not yet measured | 2026-08-20 |
treg call thecompaniesapi.companies.enrich
Swap the id for any provider above. All 31 endpoints behind this job, with their parameters and captured responses, are on the Company data shelf.
Everybody wants the same thing here, and the arguments are about what comes back and what it costs. From ~180 Reddit and X posts in August 2026, with the vendor rings removed.
“I'll give it a company name/website and it will return company size, industry, founded, market cap, maybe leadership info, etc.” r/CRM, 17 points
What this page can do about it: That is exactly this job, and 19 providers do it. The comparison below is about which fields each one actually fills, because the ask is identical everywhere.
“Every provider resolves between 94.7% and 100% of domains. That spread is not a buying signal.” r/gtmengineering
What this page can do about it: Right, so this page does not rank on it. Compare on what a filled record contains, what an empty one costs you, and the measured latency, which is where the real spread is.
“A pipeline that appends fields without validating them just produces confident-looking wrong data, which is worse than an empty field” r/Data_Enrichment
What this page can do about it: Most providers do not distinguish observed from inferred fields, and we will not pretend otherwise. Ask the agent to keep blanks blank, and treat headcount and revenue as estimates unless the provider says otherwise.
“Every vendor on this list uses the word “credit,” and none of them mean the same thing” r/Data_Enrichment
What this page can do about it: Which is why every price on this page is in dollars per call, converted from each provider's own unit at their published rate, with the date we last verified it.
A confidently wrong headcount does more damage in a scoring model than a blank one, so ask your agent to keep the empties visible.
Akta prices per section of the record you request; CompanyEnrich charges one credit per call and five more for the workforce expansion; Hunter charges only when name, size and location all come back; Ocean.io's bulk lookup is half the price of its single enrichment. The word credit means something different at every vendor, which is why this page prices everything in dollars per call.
CompanyEnrich's by-domain lookup maps one domain to exactly one company, while its by-properties route is a fuzzy match at the same price. The Companies API returns an empty object and charges nothing when a domain has no company behind it.
It resolves a domain, company name or LinkedIn URL to a structured company record: legal name, industry, employee count, headquarters, founding year, and depending on the provider the technology stack, funding history, web traffic and social profiles. It is what turns a signup email domain into a qualified account.
A domain gives the highest match rate and is deterministic. Most providers also accept a company name, a LinkedIn URL or a work email, and a few take a stock ticker.
Name, domain, industry, location and an employee range come back almost everywhere. Tech stack, funding, revenue and web traffic are provider-specific, and revenue in particular is usually modelled.
It varies, and it is worth knowing before a batch: some return a 404, some an empty object, and the free-mail domains are refused outright. Several providers do not bill for a miss.
Yes, that is the common use: turn the new user's work email domain into firmographics and route the account. One provider has a route that takes the email address directly.