Work Email Finding: a 292 Person Receipt

Measured 2026-09-16. Quality is a tie across vendors. Cost is the gap.

We ran a 292-person list (88 orgs, 16 industries, name + domain only) through five aggregators and compared the returned emails against each org's published team-page address. Every person had a public team-page email, so find rates are inflated vs. a cold list; cost per row and exact-match rate are the clean comparisons.

The run

treg.people.email.find routed across catalog providers that answered (QuickEnrich ~61%, Kitt ~36%, plus Tomba, DropLeads, Hunter, Findymail). The other columns represent alternative aggregators, not the underlying providers.

treg.toClayMonidFreckleDeepline
Found289280250281266
Exact match264262233263253
Success (exact/292)90.4%89.7%79.8%90.1%86.6%
Precision (exact/found)91.3%93.6%93.2%93.6%95.1%
Off-domain54040
Cost (finding only)$1.49$10.34$5.98$11.22$23.38
Per row$0.0051$0.0354$0.0205$0.0384$0.0801
Per correct$0.0056$0.0395$0.0257$0.0427$0.0924
Hit latency (median)0.44s11.2s2.0s65sbatch

Monid = Hunter only. Freckle = LeadMagic→Findymail. Deepline = ZeroBounce-first play. Clay dollars are at Clay's Launch data-credit list price ($0.05/credit on 2026-09-16).

What the numbers say

When to choose Clay

Choose Clay when you want a visual table, the broader Clay ecosystem for GTM orchestration, or a seat that already includes enrichment inside a bigger workflow. Spreadsheet-native teams may prefer the Clay UI over API calls.

Choose treg.to when you want a metered catalog call with a known provider price and a dated receipt. See how billing works.

Disclosures

Related: People Search, Build a Verified Lead List, Waterfall Enrichment.